This essay will explain how the jury system and democracy are related. We should also consider whether they are intended to be juries, or even whether it is possible to describe and define what public consciousness might be. This essay would also include consideration of public opinion and concerns that justify the use of juries in criminal trials. A group of people (usually twelve in number) when sworn to render a verdict in a legal case by analyzing all the evidence presented in the court room known as jury member. Trial is a method of reducing the complexity of each case in order to protect a fair and neutral administration of justice between the two litigants. First Instance Commission It considers all the issues in dispute between two parties and also provides a final legal decision on the disputed issue. In the adversarial system, resolving a dispute using the jury trial method is fair because here each party has the opportunity to assert itself. The two main types of trials are civil trials and criminal trials. The jury hears both criminal and civil cases. Without criminal prosecution, all other actions are civil, such as repairing or protecting private rights. The plaintiff and the defendant are the main parties in a lawsuit. Civil suits are disputes between private citizens and other organizations. In civil trials the plaintiff asks the court for compensation for the wrongs committed by the defendant. In a criminal case, the state, city, or county brought the lawsuit as the plaintiff, and the defendant, who committed the crime, named the defendant. The accused is informed of his accusation by means of a written document. The judiciary plays an important role in the justice system. A judge or a criminal magistrate tries to...... middle of paper... the only moment in which ordinary citizens are directly involved and make decisions, which are very important in terms of public policy, in terms of protection of people's lives and in terms of important issues. When people vote, they vote to represent them. Therefore the involvement is less direct. When a person sits on a jury their decision will have immediate, important and important repercussions on issues and individuals. The jury also uses community values ​​and public opinion to decide cases. After considering all these aspects, it seems fair to say that a jury hearing is more popular because it is the voice of the common people and represents public opinion during the hearing. The jury trial method appears to be the most fair, impartial, and natural way to establish a person's guilt or innocence. Although a panel of juries analyzes the fact of each case, so it's fair enough.