It is no secret that the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the mastermind behind the Bitcoin blockchain and the world's prime mover in crypto life, has been a mystery to his followers. However, it is not difficult to believe that Bitcoin is actually the product of the creation of the United States National Security Agency. Satoshi Nakamoto means "Central Intelligence" in Japanese, which cannot be a coincidence. It is said that Nakamoto-san's image was sold in order to represent an ideal and maintain the anonymity of those involved in the project. But it's hard to believe that a group of programmers (or just one individual, to make things more difficult) were so egoless that they didn't want to brag about the fame they would gain for the brilliance of their concept and innovation. who came with their ideas. Furthermore, no one has ever met Satoshi Nakamoto in person, and there is no conclusive evidence that could lead to his identification. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThis means that in the case of an individual, that person would definitely have intelligence training, since being in the shadows for so long would be quite difficult for an average programmer. Other evidence includes the fact that Bitcoin uses a common encryption program to create strong passwords, which is believed to have a backdoor for the NSA; numerous Reddit threads linking Bitcoin or Satoshi Nakamoto to the NSA have been removed; and that Bitcoin is not decentralized, as it is controlled by a small group led by Gavin Bell, one of the developers at the top. Claims that the NSA created Bitcoin have actually been made for years. As you know, the NSA invests millions of dollars in encrypting your information and it could be one of the clues to assume that it is one of the main agencies that could be behind the creation of this virtual currency. In itself, this does not represent anything negative, since it is part of a temporary support for the world economy and an attempt to bring out new financial products, trying not to notice a drastic decline that would call into question the incompetence of our leaders and of the economic management system they are currently leading. The NSA was one of the first organizations to describe a system similar to Bitcoin. About twelve years before Satoshi Nakamoto published his legendary white paper on Metzdowd. com, a group of NSA cybersecurity researchers published an article titled How to Make a Mint: Anonymous Electronic Money Cryptography in two prominent places, being an MIT mailing list and the second is much more prominent, The American Law Review. The article describes a system very similar to Bitcoin in that secure financial transactions are made possible through the use of a decentralized network that researchers informally refer to as the Bank. They list four things as indispensable in the proposed network: privacy, user identification (protection against imitation), message integrity (protection against manipulation/substitution of transaction information, i.e. protection against double spending) and non-repudiation (protection against subsequent rejection of a transaction - a block chain!). People have wondered why it uses the SHA-256 hash function, designed by the NSA and published by the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST). The fact that the NSA is linked to SHA-256 leads some to speculate that it created a backdoor to the hash function that no one has ever identified, allowing it to spy on Bitcoin users. Assuming the NSA did something to SHA-256which no external investigator has detected, what he achieves is the ability, with a credible and detectable action, to falsify transactions. The really scary thing is that someone finds a way to find collisions on SHA-256 very quickly without forcing or using much hardware and then takes over the network. It is clear that SHA-256, the algorithm used by Satoshi to secure Bitcoin, was not available because it was produced in 2001. However, SHA-1 would have been available, having been published in 1993. If Satoshi was, in fact, an individual who was part of the NSA, why not simply claim ownership of the identity? But more importantly, if Satoshi Nakamoto-san is a real person and not a group that wants to remain secret, why not come forward and claim his worth of nearly billions of dollars in Bitcoin? The identity of the creator of Bitcoin is the cause of constant controversy, and although several people have been credited with his name, it always turns out to be a hoax, although in this case it is usually very ambitious and carefully planned. Behind the whole tangle of "convincing evidence" that has just emerged lie interests that seem very obvious: to make Bitcoin regain the popularity it has lost in recent years and, above all, to make one of the factions involved in its economic model dominant. In addition to the success of Bitcoin, it is impossible to deny that its design is very solid, robust and easy to handle, which proves that this is not just any student's work. Of course, logically, the NSA employs individuals and is ultimately the work of mathematicians, programmers and cryptographers, but if we deduce that the most likely group is able, willing and motivated to undertake such a project, I suspect. Universities, on the other hand, have not produced such white papers from 1996 onwards. The NSA has the skills, the motivation, and the operational capacity: it has the cryptographic equipment, the fastest supercomputers in the world, and it sees the need. Whether instructed by friends of the Fed, in collaboration with their owners, or as part of a DARPA project, is unclear and we will never know. In fact, the NSA employs some of the best mathematicians and cryptographers in the world. Few people know their work because it's a secret and this is not the kind of work you leave behind to create your own crypto company. Why does the NSA want to do this? A simple reason: control. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay As we explained in the Penny Division, the US mainstream media dominates the world through economic policy, albeit backed by bombs. And the main support of the US dollar is mainly military. The link between the military system and the US dollar is inextricably intertwined. There are thousands of great examples, just one of them is how Iraq switched to the euro just before the army invaded. In October 2000, Iraq insisted on abandoning the US dollar in favor of the more multilateral euro. The changeover to the euro was announced almost exactly on the same day that the euro reached its lowest point, buying just $0.82, and the G7 finance ministers were forced to bail out the currency. On Friday the euro had reached 1,08,30% higher than then. Almost all Iraqi oil exports under the UN's "oil for food" program have been paid for in euros since 2001. Around €26 billion (£17.4 billion) have been paid for 3.3 billion barrels of oil on a blocked account in New York. The Iraqi account, held at BNP Paribas, also earned a higher interest rate in euros than it would have gotten in dollars. The.