Topic > Dystopia as a Parody of Paradise golden age in the world face of reality" (Hewitt 127). Unlike a utopian novel in which the writer intends to portray the perfect human society, a dystopian novel does just the opposite: it illustrates the worst human society imaginable in an attempt to convince readers to avoid any path that might lead towards such social degradation . George Orwell's 1984 is one such novel, a novel that "completely takes the images and ideas that the utopian imagination had worked with in the past and turns them on their head" (Fortunati 116). Orwell does this primarily through the use of settings, themes, and characters, all of these literal elements that make it clear that 1984 is a parody of the utopian principle. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayThe typical utopian city, orderly, harmonious and perfect in all facets, in 1984 is represented by a decadent and ruined London, where completely dilapidated buildings lack windows. Victoria Mansions, the residence of Winston Smith, the novel's protagonist, is squalid and dilapidated. The elevators never work, the plumbing is extremely unreliable, and the corridors "smell of boiled cabbage and old rag mats" (Orwell 5). The pavements are covered with bomb rubble and there are countless rat-infested holes in the houses. All this is due to the mismanagement of the Party, which is the supreme authority and power in the state of Oceania. In a typical utopia, one of the main themes is the cordial relationship between society and state, or "a balance between private and private". will and the general good" (Hadomi 120), due to the "full identity between the aspirations of the individual and the interests of the community" (120). In Oceania, individuals are forced into submission and any form of personal autonomy is ruthlessly repressed. The Party controls every aspect of citizens' lives by constantly observing them through television screens installed in apartments. This control can often result in punishment; therefore, "the constant and watchful gaze of Power in Oceania does not unite its people, but rather isolates and separates them" (Fortunati 117). Furthermore, in the standard utopian place, there is never "doubt or uncertainty about the functioning [of the Party] (117) and there is "no shadow of doubt or uncertainty about its motivations and functions" (117). In 1984, which it is "a cautionary satire, like all dystopias" (Beauchamp 75), the names of the ministries fully contradict their functions; the Ministry of Peace wages war, the Ministry of Truth conducts propaganda and alters texts historians and the Ministry of Love carries out various punishments and tortures. Therefore, social interaction in Oceania is based on the wrathful aspects of human nature, on the "incitement to hatred of the external and internal enemy, real or imagined" (Hadomi 122). ) In the totalitarian society of 1984, "there is ultimately no possibility of making a free choice between ethical realms" (123). Winston answers "yes" without any hesitation when asked if he is willing to throw sulfuric acid in the face of a child in the interests of the common cause. This new dystopian "morality", or rather the distortion of any moral and ethical principles, characterizes all layers of life in Oceania. The dystopian lifestyle without any freedom, privacy or morals makes Winston and Julia consider their past as an illusory dream. , they hate their present and fear their future. Winston, older and more thoughtful in nature than Julia, suffers from having no real things in himthis "real world". Therefore, he lives through his own utopia, creating islands of privacy for himself (Orwell 11). Winston often retreats to "somewhere else" in his imagination. When he and Julia make love for the first time, he dreams of this nonexistent place and "retreats into the past through childhood memories or into the future through dreams and visions of the Golden Land" (Hadomi 123). Winston's work is his "greatest pleasure in life" (Orwell 39) because it is there even when he is confronted with the past. The Party's slogan "He who controls the past, controls the future: who controls the present controls the past" (31) means that the past can be "corrected" to suit the Party's interests and ultimately be erased from people's memories . Alex Zwerdling underlines in 1984 the illusory nature of the very concept of the past: "In the novel the boundary between reality and imagination is constantly blurred, and we are often left uncertain whether anything has happened" (Zwerdling 92). After the past, Winston must deal with Oldspeak, the language that was spoken in Oceania before the Party began to abolish it for "its vagueness and unnecessary shades of meaning" (Orwell 46). Winston expresses his longing for the past by remembering his childhood and talking to the old man in the pub. Julia's more pragmatic and resilient character reveals the harshness of the dystopian world. She hates her job and is absolutely satisfied with the fact that she has had multiple affairs with her numerous colleagues. Sex for her is the ultimate rebellion; Julia's life is a constant struggle with the direct goal of violating every senseless rule that the Party has imposed on its citizens. Julia "questioned the Party's teachings only when they affected her life in some way. She was often ready to accept the official mythology, simply because the difference between truth and lies did not seem important to her" (Tentler 51). This is reflected in the scene where Julia gives black market chocolate to Winston during their first meeting. Both Winston and Julia understand that their rebellion against the Party will doom them. However, being aware of Winston's prophecy "We are the dead" (Orwell 77), they still prefer to use their fighting chance rather than be "alive" and conform to the Party's expectations. Julia and Winston go to O'Brien, the Party leader, convinced that he is against the Party. They mistake O'Brien, the main party leader, for a Liberal opponent. O'Brien's dual identity is further evidence of a dystopian distortion of reality. In utopia, any “disagreement between individuals or between individuals and collectivities would be unthinkable” (Haldomi 120). In 1984, even this disagreement is impossible since there exists a "state machine capable of creating and destroying identities at will" (122). We will squeeze you empty," O'Brien tells Winston, "and then we will fill you with ourselves" (Orwell 206). If Julia and Winston had not made a fatal mistake about O'Brien, the end of 1984 would still be optimistic: there it would at least be some hope for the future. However, if this novel were to end this way, it could not be considered a dystopia. As in many other cases in the novel, it turns out that it does not exist" O'Brien---The. opponent of the Party is nothing more than an illusion. O'Brien makes the most explicit statement in 1984 regarding inverted utopian values ​​when he tells Winston about the Party's plan for the civilization of Oceania. It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear, betrayal and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled. The old civilization held that they were founded on love and our justice is founded on hate. In the world there will be no emotions except fear, anger, triumph and 87-111.