It is already widely recognized that the judicial, legislative and executive branches of government must check and balance each other. However, in some cases, these branches of government are simply not enough to get a deeper look at what ordinary citizens need. Non-state institutions must also participate in this vital system of checks and balances. Of these institutions, it includes the media, academia, religious institutions but, above all, the result of Article 71 of the 1945 United Nations Charter, non-governmental organizations or NGOs. NGOs are those who work to contribute to the realization of human rights, the complete elimination and reduction of poverty, the protection of the green environment and, finally, the achievement of sustainable development models. These issues, however, are complex and multi-layered, and from the beginning, NGOs around the world began to cooperate and communicate with each other to strengthen and improve their impact. But how did NGOs get this far? They have certainly changed and revised their development strategy since their inception, but what was the main cause of the change? This study will show that although there have been numerous and innumerable criticisms of NGO efficiency since the beginning, NGOs have actually developed and progressed successfully throughout history by adapting to the revised development strategy. This was a necessary and crucial step for NGOs to take because the state, institutions and public policy were unable to address the host, the source of the problem. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay With the collapse of financial resources and the intensification of poverty, both national governments and donors have had no choice but to look directly to NGOs as a method of receiving benefits directly and, more importantly, cheap for the poor. That said, NGOs have started to become more aware of their potential to successfully attract national and international funding. NGOs were seen as a platform for those who wanted to not only receive beneficiaries and support, but also provide aid. With this in mind, NGOs initially appeared to successfully showcase their function as “people-centered development issues” (Korten 147). However, with new challenges looming on the horizon, there were new demands requiring NGOs to design and adapt their activities to fit the current system. The response to these various challenges placed many new NGOs in “unusual” roles that required new types of expertise (Korten). This study will subsequently present a distinction between three generations of voluntary development actions and how their development action has changed over time. There are more than 10 million NGOs currently active today and they are all rich in diversity of purpose and experience (Global Journal). However, it is still possible to define and classify three distinctive fundamental orientations in one's single programming strategy: relief and welfare; local autonomy; and development of sustainable systems. Starting with the “relief and welfare” aspect of the first NGOs, there have been countless international NGOs that started as humanitarian and charitable organizations. Organizations such as Save the Children, World Vision and CARE all fall into the category of 'welfare service delivery' (Edwards and Hulmes 1996). These models have also been shown in some local and national NGOs such as Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee or BRAC. BRAC's focus and objective was primarily that.