The League of Nations was an organization created to maintain peace in our world by resolving disputes. But did they really achieve their goal? Were they successful? According to historical facts, the League of Nations achieved six major successes in dispute settlement, known as SAMBOK; the event in Bulgaria was one of the successes. On the other hand, there were six major failures, the VIMCOD which included Corfu. But was it really like that? Was Bulgaria really a success or was Corfu really a failure? Has resolving these problems increased the League's reputation or diminished it? Personally, I believe that the two events have both gained and diminished the League's reputation, especially depending on how you look at it. Each country has a different opinion on how the League solved the problem. The one that has gained more advantages will obviously favor the League of Nations more and increase its reputation, since the country that has not been favored will not be keen on increasing the League's reputation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The most successful period for the League of Nations was during the 1920s. The actions in Bulgaria and Corfu improved the League's reputation, which was not really impressive these days. They proved that it is possible to create a peaceful world and that there is always another way to solve a problem, not just by fighting. And this is why I believe that the actions in Corfu and Bulgaria have increased the League's reputation rather than diminished it. During the Corfu action in 1923, the Italian general was killed in Greece. The Italians, in anger, invaded Greece. The problem was that one of the League's ideas was to create a peaceful world. So when Mussolini sent his army to Greece, he broke the most important rule. The League had no chance to fight with Italy, because it did not have its own army that could force Italy to leave Greece and moreover, they would break its reputation of creating a peaceful world. The League held a congress and the result was that Greece had to apologize to Italy, and also pay for it. When Greece followed the League's decision, Italy left. This decision, of course, is not right for Greece because Italy is the one that should be punished, but at least there was no war between the members of the League, they solved the problem very peacefully and this added a lot to its reputation. They have shown other countries that they can solve any problem without war. What factors caused the dispute in Corfu? In 1923 there was a dispute between Italians and Greeks. Starting with an Italian general named Tellini was assassinated in Greece while doing work for the national league, this made Mussolini (the leader of Italy) furious, he invaded Greece and conquered Corfu (a small island in Greece). The Greeks turned to the League of Nations for help. The decision was made first, after condemning Mussolini and ordering him to leave Corfu. The Greeks were forced to pay money to the League. Mussolini ignored the League's order and did not leave Corfu. There was a change in the decision due to the Conference of Ambassadors that governed the League. The problem in the end was that the Greeks had to pay the Italians and apologize for them to leave. The Greeks did what they were told by the League, so Mussolini left. Corfu was returned to Greece. The way the problem was resolved is quite acceptable because it was the Greeks who started this conflict. (The assassination of Tellini). However, theambassadors probably favored the Italians over the Greeks. Another fact is that the slain general was there to do work for the League of Nations, which means that the League should be partly responsible for his death. However the Italians were too ambitious, using the excuse of having The assassination of one of their generals extended to the occupation of Corfu. However, the way the League resolved the dispute seemed unfair to the Greeks. However, if the problem had not been solved in this way, Mussolini might have even ordered a war on the Greeks and seized more lands. According to historical facts, this event was considered a failure and diminished the League's reputation. There would be no other way to force Mussolini to leave Corfu, unless the Greeks apologized and paid for the death of their general. The way the problem was solved seemed right. However many people thought that the way the League treated the Greeks was very rude. In 1925, Greeks complained that there was one set of rules for small countries like them, and another for tougher countries like the Italians. The main problem was the way Mussolini ignored the league's order, but ended up having the Greeks apologize to him. This will make other countries think that the League will always defend the stronger countries and ignore the small ones. It was one of the main reasons that reduced the League's reputation. Later, in 1925, the Bulgaria incident occurred. The action in Bulgaria in 1925 was also a success for the League. Some Greek soldiers were killed on the border between Greece and Bulgaria. For this reason Greece invaded Bulgaria. When Bulgaria asked the League for help, the League asked Greece to leave Bulgaria. And the Bulgarian government also asked not to react to the Greeks, to reduce the conflict between them. Greece did what the League asked it to do and eventually left Bulgaria. And after this event, which ended peacefully, more and more countries began to trust the League of Nations. They truly believed that they could truly build a world full of peace. The problem was that a Greek captain and two soldiers were killed on the border between Greece and Bulgaria during a cross-border war. This angered the Greeks and Theodoros Pangalos ordered the invasion of Bulgarian territory. Relations between Greece and Bulgaria have been particularly tense since the 20th century. After their invasion the Bulgarians did not react but asked the league for help. After extensive research, it was discovered that Bulgaria only had a limit of military supplies. The league condemned the Greeks and ordered them to leave Bulgaria. The Bulgarian government ordered its army not to react, because it did not want any further conflict with the Greeks. The incident was resolved peacefully. It was considered one of the successes led by the League of Nations, a great success in Bulgaria. The League's reputation increased after this issue was resolved. Many countries started to trust the League and joined. Since then the number of countries in the league has continuously increased. Overall, the League of Nations gained popularity and increased its reputation. The Corfu and Bulgaria incidents were both resolved peacefully without causing war. This is why so many countries joined the league in subsequent years. The reputation of the league has increased day by day, to this day there are 205 countries in the league. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay These were the reasons that made me believe that actions in Corfu and Bulgaria during the 1920s contributed to the League's reputation..