Simply, we can say from the very title of this selection, that the author Ivins is decidedly against weapons. Well, that's what I initially thought, however, after reading the next sentence of the article, I realized it was the exact opposite. The title sometimes, as in these cases, can reveal important information that readers can take away before even reading the article. And this is certainly precisely the case. However, it is very misleading after reading the entire article. The author has no problem with allowing firearms, but believes that additional restrictions should be included. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Anti-gun activists are very common in the world today, their reasoning makes a lot of sense and certainly there should be more restrictions on such cases. Even with high security and gun patrols, many accidents and unnecessary actions occur because of them. As we can conclude, certainly in the recent attacks in Las Vegas. The author facilitates understanding the main topics of these selections by identifying much information in the title alone, and even more so in the corresponding paragraph published below. This is where the author's true feelings and theses lie. The title had hidden associations that misled readers to his true thoughts. Ivins concludes with many reasons why alternative protection such as guns or dogs should be used as opposed to firearms. But I feel like he's simply using these ideas as recognizable arguments rather than reality. Use these words in your headline to create non-traditional thoughts or conclusions that your audience might draw. I was definitely fooled, I thought this article would mostly talk about how firearms are harmful and should be banned, as many other articles typically do. However, the author states that firearms should be used, but people need to be responsible and their sales should be monitored more carefully. I feel a great sense of credibility from this author. These readings are honest representations of the truth of these matters. I feel that the author manages to reach her target audience by capturing their attention early. I feel like the purpose of this article is to show the importance of these issues. Gun violence is viewed completely irrationally and negative events affect people and not directly the object. It takes a person to make a gun sound, so people should be considered closely and not necessarily the object. The controversy is very definable regarding these issues. The audience certainly picks up on the author's opinions quite easily. And to some extent, relate to them too. I know, personally, I have. I believe that this selection is certainly persuasive in nature. Many of the ideas presented by Ivins revealed these facts. The audience, whether aware of the fact or not, is intrigued and persuaded to think one way or the other after reading this selection. I feel this idea is consistent with the opinions of others who have read this article. Guns aren't necessarily bad in themselves, rather people make bad choices. I feel much more informed about gun use in this country after reading these articles. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Overall, I was satisfied with the information presented in this article. There are.