My better question about the “uberization of work” would be: could anyone really live off this type of career and income? Yes, this job is an easy way to earn some extra money, but I really don't think anyone can make a living with this type of job. It is definitely convenient to do this type of work because you work at your own pace, whether you want it or not. Personally, I don't think this trend can impact my career just because this type of work isn't of interest to me. However, I believe it could impact the careers of others, just because of its convenience. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay After reviewing this week's material, from what I understand, I see positives and negatives in the "globalization continuum." As human beings we are part of this continuum of globalization, which is why it has increased so much over time. Where I see myself on the globalization continuum would probably be as a “reformer.” According to this week's presentation, reformers are “those who support globalization with reservations, believing that markets should be promoted and international barriers to trade and investment should be reduced, but that government regulation can help mitigate some of the most difficult aspects of the new changes". I have to say I see myself here because honestly there is so much manufacturing and commerce in the world today. However, I see the problems related to globalization, especially the many problems it had years ago, such as child labor and women in globalization. Fortunately, some of these problems have improved over time. Another reason I would say I would consider myself a reformer is technology, which is a huge driver of globalization today. It has changed our economy a lot, especially when it comes to people's careers, and it makes everything much faster. However, I believe that health and safety are the most important thing in any situation. Yes, I think CSR can help make work safer in the United States because it is said "...is intended to aid an organization's mission as well as guide what the company stands for and will stand for towards its consumers.” It seems that this is a safer option for businesses. The CSR program is used by many well-known companies, such as BP, Starbucks and PSE&G. I have articles and news reports on how Starbucks and its employees have gone one step further in many things, such as health, safety, and even customer service. According to an article in this week's presentation, Kim Fellner says: "...Starbucks' "fair trade" programs make a positive difference in lives. of coffee farmers." PSE&G is also said to have had workers who “suffered no serious injuries and had no fatalities during Sandy response and recovery work.” After reading these articles in the presentation, I believe that the CSR contribute positively to making work safer in the United States.