IndexDebate in favor of the death penaltyDeath practices in the USARetribution practices in the USAClosure for victims' familiesAgainst the debate on the death penaltyTactics of execution methods used in the USALethal injectionThe death penalty does not discourage the crimeDefending yourself on both sides pros and cons of the death penaltyAbolition of the death penaltyMaintaining the death penaltyThe death penalty has been a capital crime of considerable importance for many years. The decision to put someone to death has proven productive over the years. The nature of the death penalty brings the worst fate to criminals throughout history. Capital punishment has continued to instill fear among capital offenders by decreasing crime rates. The narrative of capital punishment dates back to the 18th century BC with examples of existing laws such as the Code of Hammurabi being the initial form of death penalty laws. The code provided for the list of crimes which, if committed by a person, were punishable by death. In Britain, around the 10th century, the death penalty was adopted as a guaranteed mode of execution for the English. The death penalty continued to exist over the years serving the interests of the British. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayLater, after the discovery of the new world, other countries came to understand the need to implement punishment for individuals who had committed serious crimes. For example, during the reign of Henry VIII, the people adopted capital punishment for those accused of treason against the state. Others suspected of committing murder could also be sentenced to death. An estimated 72,000 people lost their lives during the active years of the death sentence. For example, a country like the United Kingdom easily punished criminals by justifying their crimes. The ease with which the death penalty was imposed during the 18th and 19th centuries gave it the popularity it retains today. In the modern era, other forms of capital punishment have replaced the death penalty depending on the form of crime. Over these many years, the death penalty has not been voluntary, although the world has witnessed this form of punishment by some volunteers. The essay contained herein is an argumentative essay on the death penalty that offers arguments against supporting the death penalty as capital punishment for criminals. Debate in favor of the death penalty Mortality practices in the United States The death penalty receives much popularity among some individuals and groups in modern society. Accepting this brutal form of punishment causes some of the offenders to commit serious crimes. The nature of their crimes affects lives by inflicting pain on families and relatives as in the case of murders. It is believed that those guilty of murder can only be brought to justice by subjecting themselves to a form of punishment as cruel as their acts. Some death penalty supporters argue that “an eye for an eye” serves a better purpose than offering punishment sparingly. (Hoyle & Hood, 2015) states that a rational argument of these individuals is that capital punishment serves as a deterrent to criminal activity. Pro-death penalty groups believe that when the United States practices capital punishment, it helps reduce the growing rate of violent crimes. In essence, criminals fear losing their lives in the process and fear bearing the brunt and blame for their actions. Capital punishment succeeds in sending a strong message to murderers and individuals with the intent to commit violent crimes. Punishment Practices in the United States Capital punishment also succeeds inmanage the effect of punishment. In the American society of the United States, people prefer revenge; therefore, the popular belief is that when one decides to take an innocent life, then justice must be done. The only sure way to serve justice and avenge death is to inflict capital punishment on murderers. The logic behind this reasoning by pro-death penalty groups is that it creates accountability in society. People will understand the need not to fear violent crimes since punishment already eliminates the possibility of these crimes occurring. Even the heinous murders deserve surprise for their actions that leave many families mourning for their loved ones. By supporting the death penalty, it stands to reason that a criminal justice system must be accountable enough to address criminal activity. Jurors are mandated to ensure that a violent killer does not live to see the light in the end. (Hood & Hoyle, 2015) believe that the pro camp also supports the need to support a system that recognizes and respects humanity. Humanity does not involve killing innocent people, just to serve them prison sentences. Closure for victims' families Although these criminals can be imprisoned for life, the death penalty is more appropriate as it discourages disrespect for human life. This ideology implies that the death penalty is a kind of measure in place to uphold the moral order in the world. The death sentence also follows the provision of the Constitution that one can be tried in a court of law and have a verdict rendered by jurors after thorough investigation and trial. This means that they can then be sentenced to the death penalty after investigations prove their action. On the other hand, it is clear that a family that has lost a child at the hands of a brutal murderer cannot recover or regain the lives of their loved ones. Cons of the Death Penalty Debate Tactics of Execution Methods Used in the United States Lethal Injection In recent decades, research conducted on the death penalty attempts to reveal that the death penalty is not determined to curb violent crimes. Instead of this it has also been shown that the death penalty tends to discourage murders. However, there are many numerous flaws and omissions as the concept has been interpreted to fall into the fateful categories of junk knowledge. However, the consequence of death is a brutal and unusual punishment. Ideally, considering the British medical journal's research report, the death penalty has dangerous flaws and the lethal injection that is administered to capital criminals, the practice that causes extreme suffering to prisoners set to be executed in the United States of America. Death penalty receives a negative implication in the most misperception concept that is presented in the entire ruling of the law firm. The notion implemented in the ruling tends to be the ideology of costs incurred for the death penalty at the time of execution. Instead of this, this notion is believed to be true when the death penalty bill is calculated at the time of execution. For example, the involvement of the accusers and the defense lawyer requires long investigation times and preliminary hearings. Therefore, the death penalty sentence will take numerous years and the lovers will cost before the moment of execution is on the horizon. (Sundby, 2015) alludes to the fact that despite the fact that the death penalty sentence tends to cultivate and shape criminal behavior, it is necessary to consider the concept of turning them into responsible individuals. This way, they will be able to change their habits. an ideology that will fuel their morals and habitsfor life rather than incarcerating them for life or sentencing them to death. Therefore in this line of reasoning, the notion of the death penalty for crimes committed does not include the killing of criminals. Although the principles of criminal reform are not a simple thing, we should also try to do more work dedicated to changing criminal life with a more life-saving concept. Death Penalty Does Not Deter Crime In reality, most of the innocent lives have been wiped out. move away from this highly flawed practice of the state ruling due to the fact that the ethnic legacy of the death penalty cannot be eliminated or well explained. From this perspective, I tend to decide to fight for the repeal of the death penalty as it continues to offer insights into the popularity and use of the legacy gained by the concept of the death penalty to engage in slavery and racial injustice. On the other hand, the concept derived from the ruling has increased the number of death rows to over 41% in Western regions and to almost three times that percentage in dark countries. has triggered failure of resilience among different candidates as they tend to lack commitment to tackle the idea. Therefore, considering such ideology, the law tends to be an international catastrophe based on ethnically biased punishment and ineffective in handling criminal matters. According to (Rowan, Lee, & Paternoster, 2016), the history of the death penalty, more than 18,000 executions have taken place, only 43 whites were involved in killing blacks. One sensible explanation for this reasoning is that the death penalty debate has every reason to be abolished. After all, the death penalty is pure, racist. According to the chronicle of research, in vain of the execution on the wealthy strata, it is clear that more than 90% of the defendants accused of the ideology of capital crime are absolutely destitute and are unable to hire an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Furthermore, they are forced to resort to an inexperienced and overworked defense, resulting in the trial lasting no more than two weeks and thus the poor presentation of their good defense. The logic behind this line of thinking is that the ruling of the death penalty debate is dedicated to punishing the poor and leaving the rich unharmed. Defend the pros and cons of the death penalty on both sides. Abolition of the death penalty. In my analysis, the death penalty should be abolished because the concept altered in the death penalty is not humane. In addition to that, the death penalty is a brutal way of treating criminals along with the brutal methods used in the world which include beheading, hanging and shooting. On the other hand, the ideology of the death penalty is a diminishing idea. Therefore, I think that the abolition of this concept will be of great benefit in the way of dealing with capital criminal matters. For example, in 2007 Guinea and Mongolia turned their backs on the death penalty for all crimes committed in their countries. Furthermore, in the recent report, more than 106 super countries back away from the death penalty. Supporting the Death Penalty This essay supports the decision to allow death sentences to continue to work against criminals and their criminal activity. a rational approach to the issue reveals that even if it takes the lives of criminals, it leaves no room for loved families to grieve, especially in cases of murder. Finally, the sentence serves the judges to those who take away innocent lives in heinous criminal activities. In this regard, states should continue to support the death penalty with the intent to eliminate heinous acts and bring harsh justice to perpetrators of acts against humanity. Please note: this is just an example. Get a document now.