Topic > Science vs Religion: Different, but Connected

“Science without religion is lame and religion without science is blind” is a famous quote by Albert Einstein. Over the years, people have believed that science and religion have absolutely nothing in common, that science allows you to see what is proven day by day, and that religion is based on faith, on belief in things that cannot be see, but experienced. Society believes that this belief is accepted only by faith and spreads because someone says it is true. Over the years, science and religion have been considered two different fields of knowledge, with different aspects, always apparently contradicting each other. However, time has passed and people are starting to realize that, the statement mentioned before may or may not be true, that science and religion may be more united than previously thought. In fact, we can describe them as different ways of looking at the world that complement each other instead of contradicting each other. Furthermore, this idea is relatively new and has evolved due to individuals adopting and accepting other perspectives. Most of society believes that in order to believe in something, it is necessary to understand not only the theory, but also the logic behind it. When a related claim or new thesis is made, it must be demonstrated to others in such a way that it can be understood by others. Although these demonstrations are scientifically proven, religion also plays an important role, as seen in the past (Islamic figures have been responsible for very rapid advances in numerous scientific fields such as mathematics, medicine and architecture). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay As mentioned in the Quran, Holy Bible and other holy books, faith in rationality and rationality in faith are said to go hand in hand, which seemingly tend to define the existence of this world. So rationality seems to understandably reason. Furthermore, any scientist, regardless of the period in which he lived, would not have formulated a scientific assumption or truth without first believing it. Philosophically, science is defined as the knowledge of truth. Therefore, the desire to know the truth tends to correlate with the ideas and principles of religion. Religion teaches you to use your faith instead of using logic and knowledge; and science requires that one acquire knowledge to understand logic and rationality to understand the world. However, this only formulates the opinions of some scientific leaders, important figures and society, but not the entire society. Few scientists, like Darwin, mentioned in their books and articles why science and religion are not compatible and why they tend to draw different ideas. conclusions. They came to the conclusion that science and religion are actually incompatible, in the real world, because they reach incompatible conclusions. As quoted by Lawrence Krauss, “Perhaps the most important contribution that an honest assessment of the incompatibility between science and religious doctrine can make is to make it starkly clear that in human affairs – as in the rest of the physical world – reason is the key element". better guide” tends to show the opinionated conclusions of a minority of scientists. Furthermore, they are convinced that religious communities transmit the absolute truthfulness of all the statements reported in the Bible and therefore create an intervention of religion in the sphere of science. This seems to be both accepted and rejected by society which however cannot be determined by majority and.