IndexTechnological Determinism vs. Social DeterminismConclusionReferencesIn the realm of technological and social determinism, two compelling theories have emerged, each offering unique perspectives on the relationship between technology and society. Technological determinism, proposed by Marshall McLuhan, assumes that technology advances predictably and significantly shapes human events. In contrast, social determinists argue that social, political, and economic factors influence the creation and use of technology. In this essay I will lay out my agreement with the theory of social determinism, emphasizing the role of human action and social influence in shaping technology. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayTechnological Determinism vs. Social DeterminismThe debate between technological and social determinism can be aptly illustrated through the example of the iPod. Technological determinists argue that the development of the iPod was an inevitable consequence of the technology's shrinking size over time, with devices evolving from radios to record players, to Walkmans, to cassettes, and finally to iPods. However, I strongly disagree with this perspective as it neglects the profound influence of human ingenuity and decision making in technological progress. Social determinists, on the other hand, attribute the creation of the iPod to the vision of Steve Jobs, driven by a desire to excel in a market initially established by the Sony Walkman. I agree with this view, firmly believing that the power to innovate and shape technology lies in individuals. Humans are not simply passive recipients of technological advances; rather, they are the driving force behind the design and development of the machines. Our ever-evolving needs and preferences push us to create products that align with our lifestyles and facilitate convenience. Although technology becomes smaller and more efficient over time, it is not the result of predetermined outcomes but a consequence of our deliberate choices and actions. Society plays a critical role in pushing technological innovators to create new products that meet evolving preferences. Let's take the example of Facebook, a social media platform designed to foster online networking and communication. Its inception aimed to facilitate interactions between college students. Facebook's success, when compared to competitors like MySpace, highlights the social influence on the functioning of social networking platforms. It is society that determines how these technologies work, not vice versa. Humans have always looked for ways to upgrade their status and connect with others, and technology has adapted to accommodate these desires. One aspect of technological determinism that I strongly disagree with is its failure to recognize the creators behind the technology. While technological determinists emphasize the inevitability of technological change, they often overlook the vital role played by individuals in conceiving and shaping these advances. Technology and machines are entirely human creations, driven by human decision-making and innovation. It is essential to credit the ingenuity of individuals rather than attributing technological change solely to the machines themselves. In my opinion, we should recognize our role in shaping technological progress. Furthermore, I dispute the claim of technological determinists that technological progress invariably leads to," 14, 311-347.