Topic > Ethical theories and issues related to vaccination in America

IndexEthical theoriesPart OnePart TwoEthical TheoriesPart One Based on the ethics of rights, every citizen of the American population has the right to be vaccinated against the pandemic. However, the vaccine is only able to support and cover seventy percent of the population. From an ethical point of view, such a scenario causes a crisis that should be handled with the highest level of priority. Therefore, justice theory will be the most appropriate approach to ensuring that the most eligible people in the population receive the vaccine. The theory allows individuals to apply “equity” during vaccine distribution. The “social contract” stipulated by the theory is an ideal approach to ensuring that the vaccine is administered to people with the most beneficial qualities to ensure the sustenance of society after the pandemic. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Deontological ethics will ensure that vaccine priority does not cause negative consequences for the determining organism. The theory, whose approach recognizes that the organization in charge of distributing the vaccine has its “duty” to prevent the further spread of the pandemic. The organization will also accept that by administering the vaccine to the most viable candidates, they will ultimately have the certainty that was brought about by its actions. Through utilitarianism, giving the vaccine to healthy middle-aged people and children will provide the best action. The theory is inclined to establish that administering the vaccine to healthy middle-aged individuals and children will provide maximum vaccine and population utilization. The action can be justified by the theory of virtual-based ethics, which states that the value of the approach is based on the right that the above-mentioned measures will pursue. Therefore, administering the vaccine to the most viable individuals in the population is virtuous since the remaining thirty percent would do the same action if they had the chance. Part two The process of selecting and administering the vaccine to the chosen group should respect bioethical principles. Therefore a rigorous screening process will determine which person will receive the vaccine. The selection process will ensure that every member of the population has the opportunity to decide their own destiny. This means that the entire population will be subjected to the standard screening test which initially shows whether the individual is infected. After passing the test, it is justified to proceed to subsequent screening to determine the health status of the individual. The selection process is essential to ensure that the bioethical justice code provides fair judgment in vaccine requests. Please note: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Additionally, the selection process will seek to support non-maleficence through a selection checklist. If the individual does not meet the required threshold, the determination will be based on his or her usefulness in long-term or short-term procedures. The people to be vaccinated, however, should have been treated with an autonomous approach. They will have the opportunity to choose the form of vaccine administration that they believe is safest and presents the least risks. Additionally, people who do not meet the vaccine criteria will also be presented with the terms of the vaccine selection process. Offering explanations to both groups will ensure that each participant understands that the process is not a personal matter rather than a charitable action. Through this additional process, bioethical issues will be addressed..