In 2015, the United States faced many tragedies, followed by many new debates and issues. In my essay I will discuss abortion, a controversial issue in Ohio, along with many other US states. This is not a new topic, but it has become highly publicized recently. Kathy Gills defines abortion by stating that “Abortion refers to the voluntary termination of a pregnancy, resulting in the death of the fetus or embryo.” (Gills Par. 1). This issue led to the creation of two separate groups, Pro-life and Pro-choice. Pro-choice groups believe that women have the right to control what happens to their bodies and should have access to the health care needed to support whatever decision a woman chooses to choose. Pro-life groups would disagree with this view and often consider abortion morally wrong, or even murder. (Gills Par. 2). This discussion continues because without abortion there are many things at stake, but with it there are also many things to take into consideration. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get Original Essay In the early 19th century, abortion and abortion regulation were very lenient. These laws were challenged in 1973 in the Roe V. Wade court case. The court case erupted when a woman seeking an abortion could not do so under Texas law. In 1857 Texas regulated its own abortion law, so only in circumstances where the mother's life was in danger, the woman, Jane Roe, opposed this law. After the Roe v. Wade of January 1973, women had the right to abortion in all fifty states, although this right contained different rules in each state. During the 1973 court case, the court decided that not allowing abortion violated a woman's right to her own body, but it also ruled that the state had the right to regulate the procedures. (Wilson, Par.1). Despite the fact that the court case has ended with this ruling for more than 40 years, the controversy on this issue is not over and continues to arise. One of the main pro-choice arguments is the need to protect natural and constitutional rights. A member of Catholics for Choice, Jon O'Brien, talks about this in his article “Why we are and must remain 'pro-Choice'”. O'Brien states in her article "Choice recognizes that the ability to make that decision should not be determined by economic, social or political factors, but by what each woman believes is right for herself and her circumstances." (Par.21). The problem O'Brien is addressing with this quote is the freedom of "choice" only afforded to certain people based on external factors. With this quote I believe he really wants to convince his audience of the importance of giving everyone the freedom of choice. In his argument O'Brien believes that our constitutional rights are at stake and that without the pro-choice movement we will lose the right to privacy that is guaranteed at birth. The purpose of his article is to convince the public how important it is to guarantee our constitutional rights and that it would not be justice to take away the right to privacy over one's body. Pro-life is the opposite side of the issue, and is still a popular option for many. Many factors contribute to the choice to be pro-life. One of the major factors in the pro-life argument is viewing the issue from a religious position. Abortion is commonly seen as murder, which is considered one of the most morally wrong sins in many different religions, not just those related to.