Topic > Should gun control laws be stricter?

Approximately 30,000 men, women and children are killed by gunfire every year in the United States. Whether in educational institutions, cinemas, workplaces, places of worship or on live television, the world is facing a security crisis due to the ferocity of weapons. The uncontrolled possession and use of firearms, particularly handguns, represents a real risk to the well-being of society in light of the fact that guns are a major catalyst for intentional and accidental attacks and homicides. There is a requirement for there to be a waiting period before purchasing any type of firearm and for people to pass background checks in order to purchase guns. Governments should impose mandatory penalties for crimes committed using weapons, including illegal possession of firearms (Kleck and Patterson 264). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay There is no logical explanation that justifies the ease of acquiring weapons, including weapons of war, with the number of crimes, drug abuse, mental illnesses, etc. and cases of domestic violence, and the growing number of extremists in our homes and outside our homes. We have seen enough murders of students, colleagues, Christians: we don't want to hear any more attacks on talented artists like Christina Grimmie or good leaders like Gabrielle Giffords, so we want stricter legislation on firearms (Frank 735). Is it necessary for an ordinary citizen to be in a position to own a high-powered rifle or assault firearm intended for military use? It is an irresponsible lie to say that society would be safer with more guns. Apparently, history proves otherwise. When people have their weapons ready, they never have time to evaluate their murderous intentions before taking actions that cause loss of life. It accelerates the translation of their hateful impulses into aggression. Communities, especially those prone to prevalent discrimination, are severely affected every day because there is no law to adequately save citizens from gun violence. Cases from much of the world clearly demonstrate that legislation restricting the acquisition and use of firearms dramatically reduces violent crime. Common sense tells us that we should make changes to firearms legislation that keep guns out of the hands of lawbreakers and socially unstable people, while supporting capable gun owners. The stakes are very high, the costs are too high and we must not hesitate to continue fighting for sound reforms. If you have never been affected by our weak gun laws, then you should at least speak up for those who have been victims of this stupid gun cruelty in this nation. The surest way to see that children and teens are free from gun-related injury laws is to eliminate firearms in our homes and communities. Furthermore, we can put an end to the negative effects of firearms in the lives of our youth by adopting a practical and practical gun ban. However, it is arguable that increasing gun restrictions in the law cannot prevent those who are evil from doing harm. things. Unfortunately, legislation cannot eliminate human nature. No matter how many laws we may enact, it stands to reason that there will still be some people who deliberately continue to carry out their evil acts. Overly restrictive gun laws like those in South Carolina make it impossible for innocent civilians.