Should retailers cut their losses and run away from Bangladesh? The question of whether it is morally correct and permissible for a company to cut losses and procure a new one in the wake of the disaster weighs on a company's responsibility as a moral agent. Growing confusion among retailers over whether to leave the region sparks debate over retailers' obligation to stay and their ethical responsibility to Bangladeshi workers. The factory collapse on 24 April 2013 which saw the deaths of over 1100 workers saw working conditions scrutinized. The document examines the circumstances that have affected the largest clothing exporter and which is home to up to 3.6 million garment workers. This essay will elaborate the ethical responsibility and dictate the moral obligation of retailers on the working conditions of garment workers in Bangladesh. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essay Despite being the second largest exporter of apparel, Bangladesh still has the lowest wages in the world. The recent trail of tragedies that have left retailers and companies guessing about their next course of action has opened up a debate about their moral obligations. Disney's phaseout announcement has also contributed to the instability of Bangladesh's apparel sector, while other retailers are contemplating a similar move. The impact of the decision will have a profound impact on the fate of the region's 3.6 million workers. Regardless of the working groups' urges for retailers to stay, the underlying determining factor is the moral duty required of retailers that matters. The successful growth of Bangladesh's garment industry, as a result of the increased number of low-wage workers and less restrictive labor laws, saw the creation of low-cost garment manufacturing (Stewart 4). According to Zimmerman and Shah's 2013 analysis, it is low-cost garment factories that set the stage for a number of fatal accidents (B1). The lack of adequate and effective structures has made it necessary for factories to equip themselves with independent factory inspectors. Nonetheless, unethical issues are critical and undoubtedly an issue that requires the cooperation of many participants before substantial improvements can be achieved. Salma Zaidi, from the World Bank's Dhaka office, is of the opinion that "Bangladesh is a desperately poor country and still needs these factories", furthermore, "we need more security, better care... these They're still better jobs than most other jobs." possibilities” (Fairclough 11). It is therefore crucial that retailers remain in Bangladesh and improve working conditions. In light of the pertinent ethical issues facing the country and its garment sector, Karel De Gucht's 2013 findings show that, "... these people are... we can't say underpaid, they are practically unpaid... they have to work in totally unacceptable health and safety operations (Zain 8). The causal problem is attributed to the fact that retailers in Bangladesh demand higher operational standards for factories while not being willing to pay more state clothing manufacturer is of the opinion that if retailers paid 10% to 15% more it would have a huge impact. The fact that a number of manufacturers regularly place larger orders than the.