Comparison of Indian Education SystemPrivate School vs Government SchoolBetween the academic years 2010-11 and 2015-16, the number of private schools grew by 35% – from 0.22 million in 2010-11 to 0.30 million in 2015-16, while the number of state schools increased by only 1%, from 1.03 million to 1.04 million. According to Gandhi, tiny (with 20 or fewer students) and small (with 50 or fewer students) government schools are abandoned. Over the five-year period, the number of small state schools grew by 52% and small ones by 33.7%. As many as 5,044 state schools had no students in 2015-16, up 14% from 4,435 in 2010-11. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on the topic "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get an original essay The migration of students from state schools has left many incapacitated, with high spending per pupil and low value for money from public spending on education. Around 24,000 government schools in Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh have closed their doors. West Bengal witnessed a 280% increase in small schools – more than any other state – followed by Madhya Pradesh (225%) and Jharkhand (131%). However, Bihar bucked the national trend by reporting a 98% decline in small schools. Government Teachers in India earn four times the salary of those in China, but do not perform as well. Indian government teachers earn more not only than their counterparts in private schools but also in other countries. Despite being paid at least four times the salaries of teachers in China, Indian teachers' performance, judged by students' level of understanding, was poor in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) test in 2009, with the India in 73rd place and China in 2nd place, out of 74 countries. PISA is a global study conducted by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in member and non-member countries on the academic performance of 15-year-old students in mathematics, science and reading. Comparison of Indian Education System with Foreign Education SystemIndian education focuses more on theory than practice. It doesn't allow for creativity. Whereas abroad; they give greater priority to practice-based learning. And they let creativity come into education. Education is a formality for every Indian. They must obtain a degree in Engineering or medical field; whether they learned something or not In foreign countries, education is considered a learning process. Their curriculum contains everything from arts to sports along with studies. The United States has arts, sports, music and theater on its agenda. Australia focuses more on sports; they have cricket, hockey and boxing on their university curriculum. Whereas in Indian education system the emphasis is only on studies. There is no room in our system for extracurricular activities. In Dubai: Primary and secondary education is free and made compulsory by law. In India, however, education is a thriving sector. From privatization of education to tuition and coaching institutes. Education generates good profits in the economy In India students are not given the option to choose their field of interest. You have to become an engineer or a doctor! Sports and art are considered made for leftovers. If you don't get admission in commerce science stream; choose art. This is what Indians feel. In India; students are admitted to courses that have a higher pay scale or a larger number of jobs. And in a foreign country; students are admitted on a basisto their field of interest. In India; students take admission by seeing the trends. So, if in a particular year, most of the students rush towards Mechanical Engineering, you are bound to take admission in Mechanical Engineering. Students are not given the option to select their own streaming field. In brief in India; let's go with the flow. Where as in foreign countries, students wait to be admitted into their field of interest. Students are expected to memorize facts and figures. Thousands of mathematical equations, birth and death dates of freedom fighters, chemical reactions and hundreds of other things. Let's emphasize the theory. And in the foreign country they affect students' knowledge through practical implementation. The Indian education system teaches old technologies. The education system has not changed much since independence. The Indian education system is very bad at adopting latest technologies in the curriculum. In foreign countries; the curriculum changes every day based on the updated technology and industry requirements. And finally we believe in grades and certificates. We believe in admissions to IITs and IIMs. Foreign countries believe in skills. They no longer care about the educational institution, all they see is what you have learned throughout your schooling. Problems and Challenges Faced by the Indian Education System Expenditure on Education In terms of expenditure incurred on education, especially higher education, during the year During 2010-2011, the government spent around Rs.15, 440 crore, which is about 85% of the revised budget estimates for the year. The recent 66th edition of the NSSO survey reveals that between 1999 and 2009, overall education spending increased by 378 percent in rural and 345 percent in urban areas of the country. The survey also reveals that spending on children's education shows a sharp increase: 63% for rural families and 73% for urban families. However, if we measure education expenditure as a percentage of GDP, India lags behind some developed/developing nations. We recognize that the gap in investment in education in India can perhaps be filled by the private sector playing a crucial role. Currently, in India, there are approximately 1.86 million students enrolled in various streams of higher education, including business management.3 Despite the large number of students studying in various streams, we have not seen any significant change in productivity as skills and talents are in short supply to support economic activities and, therefore, there is a serious concern about the employability of these educated people. The gross enrollment ratio (GER) for higher education in India was 12% in 2010. However, the enrollment level varies from state to state. We must also recognize that our enrollment level is much lower than that of many other countries. According to one report, for example, the GER is 23% for China, 34% for Brazil, 57% for the United Kingdom, 77% for both Australia and Russia, and 83% for the United States. In this context, the government authorities' attempt to increase the number of students by 2020 in order to reach the GER of 30% becomes a great challenge. No, however, the launch of new institutes like JRE School of Management can play a catalytic role in addressing the challenge of rising GER in India. As a positive step, for the remaining duration of the 11th Five Year Plan, the government has taken initiatives to incentivize states to set up/expand existing educational institutions, set up 8 universities, expand colleges to achieve the target of 1 lakh enrolled students . and programs to create model colleges in regions thatare below the national GER average. Capacity Utilization Another challenge to be addressed in strengthening India's education system is to improve capacity utilization. For example, a recent study on capacity utilization in India for higher education indicates that capacity utilization in case of MBA is around 57% in Maharashtra and 72% in Haryana. In some states there are many vacancies in institutions. On the one hand, we need to improve our GER and on the other, we need to ensure that the institutions/colleges/schools created to provide higher education fully utilize the capacity created. Infrastructure Facilities One of the factors why capacity utilization is low in future/new institutes/universities (both private and public sectors) is their inability to provide the physical infrastructure required to run the institutes. Desirable infrastructural facilities to classify the best quality institutions include real estate, state-of-the-art classrooms, libraries, hostels, furniture, sports facilities, transportation, commercial buildings, etc. We must ensure apolitical participation of the private sector in the establishment of universities to provide quality physical infrastructure. PPP Model The government is making efforts to improve the education system in terms of various parameters such as GER, quality, investment, infrastructure, etc. But we must recognize the constraints for the government to make a major turnaround with huge investments in education. I believe that the private sector has started to play a distinctive role in improving the education system in India. In this context, it is useful to explore the possibility of a public-private partnership (PPP) model in education. This will not only reduce the government's burden of incurring high costs to provide basic infrastructure but also lead to the construction of state-of-the-art buildings, laboratories, libraries, hostels, etc. Furthermore, collaborative efforts between universities/colleges and companies would help in organizing joint research and development, students would be exposed to industrial activities in terms of internships, corporate training during holidays and issuing certificates by companies for having attended internships/training etc. and, therefore, facilitating image building and branding of institutions and making students more job-worthy. Student-Teacher Ratio Another challenge to improve the Indian education system is to improve the student-teacher ratio. In India, this ratio is very high compared to some comparable countries in the world. For example, while in developed countries this ratio is 11.4, in the case of India it reaches up to 22.0. It is even low in the CIS (10.9), Western Asia (15.3) and Latin America (16.6). This entails the need to recruit quality teachers and strengthen the teachers needed to manage the lessons. I also believe that, as in developed countries where students are given part-time teaching assignments, we can also explore such possibilities in technical/higher education to handle lower level classes. It is also expected to help students partially meet educational expenses. Accreditation and branding: quality standards To improve the skills and talent of our large population, it is necessary to increase the quality and standards of our education system. It is known that many of our professionals (engineers/doctors/management professionals) remain unemployed despite the numerous opportunities open in the globalized world. One of the major factors is the lack of quality education which results in a skilled but unemployable category. We need to introduce/activate the..