Technology and Electronic EvidenceMany units are falling behind in their handling of electronic evidence. There are several clarifications about this, such as the rapid changes and proliferation of electronic gadgets, budgetary restrictions, and a dearth of good training opportunities. Conducting electronic forensic analysis can cost a lot of money due to the important licenses, tools, and experts needed to make the entire process a success (Argy & Mason, 2007). Showing sufficient investment income in terms of costs is very important to safeguard the purchase of command employees. Funding these determinations can be a major issue for smaller departments as the entire process can include a complex combination of local, state and federal budgets. However, regional approaches and other types of alliance can be of great importance as long as police officers are keen to identify where they should take their help. In short, electronic evidence needs to be planned for and is very important at almost every stage of the investigative or judicial process. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original EssayWhen a legal process or action on transactions conducted electronically, the same electronic records that brought practical benefits to the business can cause evidentiary problems for the law (Clemente & Obar, 2016). Some rules and regulations are proposed to control the collection and use of electronic evidence. In Canada, most of these policies are found and explained in detail in the Canada Evidence Act. Additionally, police officers need legal authorization and appropriate equipment before they begin collecting evidence during a criminal investigation. Police officers need a digital search warrant before receiving any electronic evidence in a criminal investigation. A search warrant may be granted to examine a computer or electronic medium if there is reason to believe that the media has some evidence of a crime, results of the crime or has been used as an instrument of a crime (Sheppard, Duranti & Rogers , 2010). Search warrants should specifically state the area to be searched and the items to be seized. For example, when electronic storage media are supposed to be examined because they contain details that constitute evidence of a crime, the things to be arrested according to the warrant should often focus on aspects of the related files rather than the physical storage media. In some domains, magistrates may impose particular situations on how to carry out the search or require the police to clarify their strategy for limiting the search before granting the warrant. Furthermore, courts have insisted that the Fourth Amendment requires that forensic evaluation of a computer or electronic gadget be made within a reasonable period. A prolonged delay in obtaining a search warrant to examine the seized electronic device is considered senseless under the Fourth Amendment. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay After obtaining the digital search warrant, the police can search anything listed in the warrant (Duranti, 2010). Computer documents, emails, messages, reports, photos and Internet stories are examples of details that can be collected by police officers from electronic gadgets and used very efficiently as evidence. For example, mobile devices.