The debate over whether college athletes should be paid has been made many times. There are those who are in favor and many who are against the idea of ​​paying athletes who play sports for their universities. There are many reasons why people believe college athletes should receive. For example, a college athlete spends their time practicing. There are numerous reasons why student athletics should not be paid. The discussion highlights the reasons why the payment should not be made. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay College athletic programs can't afford to pay athletes; universities don't have enough money to pay all the athletes. If universities paid athletes, they would not be allowed to pay only certain students and leave others, or to pay for some sports and do away with others. It wouldn't be right. Every athlete will demand payment, making it difficult to allocate money to college athletes. They can also pay athletes and the sports season has negative revenue. If universities end up paying their players, that will result in them demanding more than the college can offer. There is no fair way to pay college athletes. Some believe that payment should be based on the open market system. When that happens, supply and demand will come into place and the college will be able to pay the player based on the revenue generated due to his talent. The payment will vary depending on the agreement each player has with the school and local market. If the school paid a high student fee, it could suffer damage, and if there was no such pay, disagreements could arise between the players and the management in the future. Determining player value raises the question why hires can be made at a lower rate and improve dramatically over the course of the season. The fact also remains that every college may not be able to hire the player they want because they can't afford it. Students are not professionals; students should not be forced into the role of practitioners. College is a place to learn, and whether the student wants to become a professional athlete or a doctor, they will not be a professional while still in school. Students should not be paid a salary like professionals since they are not. The fact is, student athletes need to view college sports as a vehicle that takes them to higher education. The point remains: the student-athlete is a mere amateur like the nursing student who chooses to take part in the educational experience. Since this is the case, it doesn't matter how many touchdowns the student gets since they are not professionals and should not be earning professional money. College students are financially irresponsible to pay. Adding money to these students' lives will accelerate further problems. A college student does not understand proper money management as most fail to maintain a budget. Some even indulge in luxury activities which end up draining all their money. Access to a lot of money drives these players crazy by making bags without due consideration. Paying college athletes will ruin college sports. Once paid, the university gaming industry will suffer. If they begin to receive payments, athletic departments at the university level would turn into businesses, which would undermine the robust university system. Paying athletes a, 36(1), 68-88.