In a world full of controversy and disagreement, it is somewhat difficult to describe a contrasting event in a neutral tone based on one's own judgment, typically for those historians who have attempted to examine history events that happened in the past. As a matter of fact, people's perspectives can be influenced by many conditions such as their cultural identities, gender, religions, emotions, etc. Therefore, it is more likely that historians tend to have a biased view that can influence their tone in neutrality. However, to what extent can historians, or more generally people, learn history from an impartial and neutral perspective? In general, as long as people analyze the points of view of both sides equally and take the position between the two, they can describe the story neutrally. To help demonstrate that historical facts can indeed be described in a neutral tone, two effective examples below, which are the Korean War and the Vietnam War, could provide sufficient justification. An impartial description of any historical event should consist of objectivity or neutrality. The term “neutral” can be used in various aspects for different purposes: “neutron” as uncharged particles in science; uncolored paintings; neutral on the side that stays out of disputes between countries. The only core value neutrality has in common is that a person, event, or act lies halfway between two extreme, opposing sides. Having said that, having a neutral tone means that you cannot describe a historical event using a partial, subjective and biased point of view, so you should not choose sides but should stay in the middle. Set in the 1960s, a huge dispute has occurred within the K...... center of the card...... to spread again. The Chinese began to claim their position similar to the Korean War: to defend their allies and protect them from US invasion, and that the US was kicked out of the war by them. Hilariously, the Chinese again distorted the neutrality of tone, judging the whole event solely from their own perspective which obviously contained biased and selfish opinions. However, if all these events were to be described by an outsider, such as a Danish historian or a Canadian academic institution, then such prejudices or biased criticism would not exist, so that the tone could be maintained in neutrality. History is a record of current traces of significant events that occurred in the past. As long as people analyze the points of view of both sides equally and take sides between the two, historical events can be described in a neutral tone.