Topic > Critical Analysis of Monsanto's Harvest of Fear?

Barlett and Steele, after making a clear case against the Monsanto Company's legal tactics, fail to provide adequate evidence to supplement testimony of extra-legal tactics, leaving readers in the position of vindicating the company's alleged conduct Monsanto based on its legal assault. Barlett and Steele's decision to supplement their arguments with first-person narratives of targeted victims added characters to an otherwise valid chronological observation and provided authentic testimony against faceless corporate representatives who may not represent the views and the opinions of their employers. Barlett and Steele, who have commented minimally on the differences between non-GMO/GMO products, criticize Monsanto's aggressive and unorthodox expansion and abuse of the legal system to draw attention to the heavy-handed company and its