As Canada is part of the 52 nations associated with the British Commonwealth, there is no doubt that Canada had strong relations with Great Britain. The Confederation in 1867 aimed to create a Dominion with greater autonomy over internal affairs. Canada retained its nation as an autonomous entity within the British Empire, subordinate to the British Parliament until the Statute of Westminster came into force in 1931 (in which Great Britain granted full internal and external autonomy to all its domains). ). This execution allowed the Canadian Parliament and all former Commonwealth colonies to enjoy full legal freedom, except in areas where they voluntarily choose to remain subordinate to Great Britain. In view of this affiliation, I believe that Canada should not separate from the British Commonwealth and should remain connected with England and the Royal Family; for reasons that the monarch can grant immunity from prosecution and pardon any offense against the Crown before, during or after a trial, the idea of ​​carrying out democratic reforms in his colonies and helping them establish their own, and gives Canada access and influence in diplomatic matters circles. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an original essayTo begin with, a plentiful number of people collectively underestimate the authorities that the royal family of England can impose in a country, and this is pursued through acts of inhibition or facilitation. As you know, the British monarchy is led by Queen Elizabeth II, the powers of the monarch's authority are fundamental to any Commonwealth governing country and its leaders. For example, the Queen has powers in political divisions such as the following districts; appointment of prime minister, declaration of war and freedom from prosecution. However, the Queen has a very imminent factor regarding judicial powers, particularly royal pardon. “Royal pardons were originally used to overturn death sentences against those who had been wrongly convicted. It is now used to correct errors in sentencing,” however, a royal pardon does not in itself nullify a conviction. Royal pardons are commissioned through the “RPM” which is the Royal Prerogative of Mercy, is a prerogative of the Monarch, and is “exercised in Canada only by the Governor General or the Governor in Council”. Immunity is granted in unprecedented circumstances in deserving cases involving federal crimes, where no existing remedy within the law can reduce the serious and adverse effects of criminal jurisdiction. That said, it is unwise for the monarch's judicial powers to be able to vest such authority in the Governor General of Canada or the Council. Therefore, with Canada's connection to the Commonwealth, immunity can be granted to those seeking a royal pardon. For example, Viola Desmond, an African-Canadian businesswoman from Nova Scotia who challenged racial segregation norms. Viola refused to leave a whites-only section of a movie theater, which led to her being convicted of a minor tax violation that later led to a tax evasion charge. It is noted that, “On April 14, 2010, the Lieutenant Governor of Nova Scotia, Mayann Francis, invoked the Royal Prerogative and granted Viola Desmond a free posthumous pardon, the first of its kind to be granted in Canada. an extraordinary remedy granted under the Royal Prerogative of Mercy occurs in the rarest of circumstances, differs from simple pardon in that it is based on innocence and recognizes that a convictionwas wrong.”. This case is exemplary of how Viola, despite being unjustly convicted, obtained legitimate immunity and was found innocent. Therefore, if Canada were no longer part of the Commonwealth, this judicial power would be abolished in the name of the British monarchy, and innocent people like Viola Desmond who deserve royal pardon would be subject to unjust treatment and neglect. When celebrating Canada's democratic reforms it is important to know the story of its origins. In parliament a key role in fulfilling governmental responsibility is the trust that parliament can create laws and taxation. These practices originated in Great Britain, the move to the “BNA,” known as British North America, revolutionized the control the colonists had over their internal affairs. Before the BNA, colonial governors would follow the lead of policies imposed by colonial ministers in Britain. Democratic reforms in Canada consisted of British admirers aiming for responsible government in British North America. During the 1830s, the primary goal was to "alleviate the restlessness felt by many colonists toward the small groups of powerful local elites who controlled the colonial governments and to keep the colonies secure, if freely within the British Empire". such as William Lyon Mackenzie in Upper Canada and Louis-Joseph Papineau in Lower Canada were more accustomed and familiar with American-style political reforms, however, more civil reformers such as Joseph Howe in Nova Scotia, or Robert Baldwin in Upper Canada, are two individuals who prefer the British style of government. Between the four reformers mentioned above, and two other influential reformers not mentioned, they had collectively come to a consensus on an organized party system, in which leaders occupied direct seats in the legislature, this was imperative for authoritative government. Joseph Howe in Nova Scotia, with the compliance of Baldwin and Louis LaFontaine of the Province of Canada (Upper and Lower Canada conjoined), established reform parties to obtain reliable governments. Initially accomplished in Nova Scotia in January 1848, the Province of Canada also succeeded in the same year. It was eventually commissioned to the "PEI" of Prince Edward Island in 1851, New Brunswick in 1854, and Newfoundland and Labrador in 1855. After Confederation in 1867, the western provinces established their own reliable governments. Thus, achieving accountable governments by province was a gradual process, as Canadians gained sufficient control to dictate their own political affairs and achieve, without revolution, national self-direction. That said, it is evident that governance in Britain provided Canada (despite being a British colony) with clear models for creating autonomous governments through trial separations between Canada's provinces. Therefore, the result is that Britain helps Canada establish its own democratic reforms. As you may know, the British Commonwealth can be interpreted and seen as a diplomatic coalition. In fact, every two years, the leaders of the Commonwealth gather at the Heads of Government meeting, to which they convey shared concern and adhere to unified policies and initiatives. All representatives of the Commonwealth are considered equal, regardless of monetary stature or the size of their lands, where all representatives collectively give smaller states a voice in international politics and an insight into diplomatic circles that they may not have. In particular, Canada is known for its diligent advocacy of the needs of smaller nations when it comes to politicsinternational. It is worth noting that a key part of the Commonwealth is the secretariats; helping affiliated countries strengthen their public policies and management capacity to achieve trade and monetary growth, makes it a “key multilateral partner for Canada in formulating, negotiating and implementing trade policies, diversifying export bases, strengthening debt management and attracting new investments". Furthermore, the secretariats establish peace and democracy by strengthening democratic institutions and developments in affiliated nations such as; reconstruct electoral processes, strengthen the rule of law, adopt and facilitate human rights standardsIn the 1970s Canada's foreign policy objectives were strengthened to protect sovereignty and independence, broker peace and security, support social equity, in which the traditional diplomatic vision was realized. Finally, in 1982, Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau and his Liberal Party government successfully achieved Canadian autonomy by repatriating the Canadian Constitution. At that point, the highest law in the country, enacted by the authority of the British parliament, was transferred to Canada. Thus creating the “British North America Act”, a fragment of Canada's colonial history, it was reinstated as the “Constitution Act”, in 1982, this act included the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Therefore, the British Commonwealth has done its due diligence in granting Canada access and influence in diplomatic circles. This is evident through the preservation and restoration of constitutional acts that had received diplomatic mandate from leaders such as Pierre Trudeau, Prime Minister at the time, easing human rights standards with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Similarly, in 2011, Canada supported Commonwealth institutions by assisting the Virtual University of Small Commonwealth States which provided courses at six institutions each in a different country, while also assisting seven nations to establish and adopt eight distinct agreements and human rights conventions. Such adoption and establishment included the protection rights of children, the protection of the rights of people with disabilities, and the protection of political rights. That said, it is clear that this example demonstrates how the Commonwealth provided Canada with diplomatic relations that aided the establishment and adoption of human rights. This also allowed Canada to ratify its influence and establish itself in diplomatic circles (nations) with which it was not originally affiliated. One might argue that a different conclusion could be drawn from the above-mentioned facts. It is true that Viola Desmond, although unjustly convicted, was honored with a posthumous pardon. If Viola had been alive, she would have been recognized as an innocent person who deserved a just acquittal. However, this is not the case, for this reason, the posthumous pardon does not excuse the fact that the real pardon of presumed immunity of the unjustly convicted occurred due to unprecedented circumstances, for which Viola did not have the benefit of the doubt and by virtue of which it was never presumed innocent. This would not have been the case if Viola's case had been thoroughly investigated, if there had been a thorough investigation, a different conclusion might have bestowed the royal pardon she would have rightly deserved had she been alive. Furthermore, what you have proposed regarding democratic reforms has disadvantages. The British Commonwealth did not physically aid the process of Canada establishing its own democratic reforms, rather it influenced process separations. A disadvantage of trial separations is that the provinces work unilaterally towards the,.