Topic > The Story of Creation vs. the Theory of Evolution

Creation is the only true justification for why man was created and should be the only explanation why all people are created specifically for a purpose from God. The Bible contains hundreds of verses with the expressions “if” and “then.” Biblical “if – then” statements are related to the common meaning of ordinary words and affairs. For example, Genesis 24:8 “But if the woman is not willing to follow you, then you will be free from this oath of mine; just don't take my son back there." Another example, if a witness refuses to publicly testify to what he saw, then he will be guilty (Leviticus 5:1). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay Formal logic did not arise until Aristotle. Logical syllogisms only date back about a century. In mathematical logic, words often have metaphysical meanings. For example, if the universe is 6,000 years old, its diameter cannot be greater than 6,000 light years. In this logical proposition, some metaphysical definitions are relied upon without proof. We do well to take it seriously and literally, because God is able to say what He means, and will one day hold us accountable to believe what He says! Furthermore, the account is reasonable and logical, fully in accord with all true science and history. The following logical chain, while not convincing those who refuse to believe, at least demonstrates the reasonableness of biblical creation. Berry 2 It is axiomatic that there are only two possible fundamental models of origins - that is, of the origin of the universe, of the earth, of life, human life and all the fundamental systems of the cosmos. These are, in simpler terms, evolution or creation. Either the origin of things can be understood in terms of continuous natural processes, or it cannot: one or the other. If this is not possible, then we must resort to complete supernatural processes to explain the origin of at least the fundamental symptoms of the cosmos. Evolution and creation therefore exhaust the possibilities, as far as origins are concerned. This necessarily means that if we can “falsify” one of the two models of origins, then the other must be true. There is no other option. By definition, evolution should still be taking place, as it must be explained by current processes. If there is anything certain in this world, however, it is that there is no evidence that evolution is occurring today, that is, true vertical evolution, from a simpler type to a more complex type. No one has ever observed the evolution of a star from hydrogen, the evolution of life from chemicals, the evolution of a higher species from a lower species, a man from an ape, or anything else of the sort. Not only has no one ever observed true evolution in action, no one knows how evolution works, or even how it might work. Since no one has ever seen it happen, and no one has yet found a working mechanism to explain it, it would appear that it has been falsified, at least as far as the current world is concerned. This does not prove the opposite. Berry 3 happened in the past, of course, but the evolutionist should recognize that this means it is not science, since it is not observable. Evolution must be accepted on faith. And the past? In fact, there is no evidence that evolution ever occurred in the past either. In all of recorded history, which dates back nearly five thousand years, no one has ever recorded the natural evolution of any type of creature into a more complex species. Furthermore, all known vertical changes appear to be going in the wrong direction. Since records have been kept, an average of at least one species has gone extinct every. 3: 11).