Ladder begins with the data. There is a huge amount of data in the world and we have limited capacity to absorb it. Research suggests that we only take into account about 10% of the available data. Next, we select the data. We then add meaning to the data we select so that it makes sense to us. Based on the meaning we add, we form conclusions and then act on those conclusions. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay The cycle begins again when the results of our actions become data for another journey up the ladder. Over time, our conclusions form our beliefs and assumptions and values; these filter the data we select and the meaning we add when we repeat this process. This is another way to illustrate the point made in the last section: our mental models tend to be part of reinforcing, self-perpetuating structures. Implications Our ability to make inferences is an essential skill, allowing us to act quickly in emergencies and efficiently in routine situations. situations. We assume that other people see the world the way we do. When we disagree with others, we usually argue about our conclusions. We assume that we have selected the same data and added the same meaning to this data. We usually "jump" up the ladder, unaware of the rungs we have climbed. We often make these leaps without testing our reasoning process or the data they provide us. the cycle started. We assume that our conclusions are the “truth.” Our assumptions and beliefs are often kept private and untested. How to Use the Ladder of Inference Consciously using the Ladder of Inference is a simple way to increase collective intelligence. Experiment with the following steps in low-stakes situations, then apply them in higher-stakes situations. If you're used to winning/losing debates with some people, they may be suspicious of your new approach at first. Be patient. Practice naming the assumptions you are making and their influence on your actions. Play “detective” or “defense lawyer” and insist on separating data or evidence from conclusions. Notice the types of conclusions you tend to confuse with facts. When providing recommendations (or endorsements), share your “scale” or reasoning. When others make a recommendation, ask them to share their reasoning with you. Please note: this is just an example. Get a custom paper from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay When disagreements arise based on different data, ask those involved to assume that all known data is “true.” What new conclusions can be drawn? Is there any other data that could impact these conclusions? How we can expand our data pool?