As the end of high school approaches, some student-athletes have the opportunity to play a sport in the NCAA. One question they might ask is, “Is it worth playing a sport in college?”, considering all the time spent on sports while having to maintain good grades and not receive any pay. You have to be a hard working person to be an NCAA college athlete as it is basically a full time job that ranges from the classroom, to training, to the weight room, and even watching film. Imagine being an NCAA college athlete, your daily routine would consist of waking up early most days to train. After morning practice, you attend class. So, since you often miss class and struggle to keep your grades up, you have a tutoring session. And to finish the day, you will have more practice which will probably end late and you will have little time to sleep. Athletes must follow this routine throughout the school year. With all the time athletes spend on sports and studies, they don't have time to work at a job and have extra money to spend. So this essay seeks to answer the question: Why should college athletes be paid? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why Violent Video Games Shouldn't Be Banned"? Get an Original Essay There are many reasons supporting why NCAA college athletes should be paid. The first is that athletes do not have enough time to have a job because they constantly practice or play the sport they are involved in. Education is expensive, and many people who play sports do not receive scholarships to help pay for tuition, housing and expenses. table or books. This can lead to increased debt because they have to borrow money to pay for education. Many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, name and brand, while others believe that it would ruin college sports if athletes were paid. When the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was founded by President Roosevelt in 1906, there was a commitment not to provide a salary to student-athletes who took part in his athletic organization. This was based on the idea that college athletes should be considered amateurs, not professionals. According to Businessinsider.com, college athletes spend an average of more than 30 hours a week just in practice, while some have reported spending more than 40 hours. But college athletes aren't simply required to play sports 40 hours a week. Their schedule also includes a full-time college schedule that they must maintain if they want to stay in school and continue playing college sports. For example, “if a student has 10 hours of instruction each week and dedicates the recommended four hours of study for each hour of instruction, athletes spend 50 hours each week studying and attending required classes and study halls. This means college athletes have to work 90 hours a week just to stay in school on their scholarships. This is equivalent to working two full-time jobs with a side job on the weekends just to pay the bills.” The debate over whether college athletes should be paid is not a new concept. Some people believe that a scholarship should be sufficient payment. After all, a scholarship can easily be worth $25,000 or more per year, plus a career after college that can be worth a million dollars over a lifetime. Additionally, student-athletes receive all kinds of benefits while in college,like staying in luxury hotels, being seen on national television, and all the notoriety that comes with being a top athlete. It's hard to put a price on all of this. But if you really take a look at the facts about scholarships, you might change your mind. Only about one in three student-athletes receives a scholarship. Most scholarship recipients find that they pay only a portion of the expenses. With all the time and energy they devote to sports: “college athletes should be considered somewhat dependent on students because their first job is to play sports for the university, before obtaining an education.” After all, even though the NCAA maintains that college athletes are just students, NCAA tournament schedules require college athletes to skip class for nationally televised games that bring in revenue. A college coach's job is to recruit players who they think have the talent to make them great. win. Many times they convince them to come to school by offering them scholarships. The idea behind a scholarship is to attract the athlete to become a student and athlete at their college. Scholarships are nothing more than a recruiting tactic. In fact, many times these scholarships pay for tuition, room, board, and books, but these athletes have no money for other needs. When providing a service, people normally get paid for the service, so college athletes should be paid to perform a service with their athletic ability. They provide entertainment to millions of fans every year. Almost everyone involved in sports, whether they watch or play it, has an opinion on whether or not college athletes should be paid. College sports make billions of dollars, so there is room for athletes to get paid in some way. The financial outlook for the NCAA is completely different than it was 10 years ago. The NCAA basketball tournament generated $9 million annually in 1981, $215 million annually in 1997 and generates approximately $750 million annually now. Without the athletes this income would not be possible, but it is still unpaid. Even if scholarships were considered paid, student-athletes are underpaid in proportion to what they generate for the college. For example, “in professional football and basketball, for example, players are paid about half of the revenue generated.” College athletes should in no way be paid as much as professional athletes, but they deserve a little incentive for all their hard work in their respective sports and in the classroom. Additionally, “the NCAA currently produces nearly $11 billion in annual revenue from college sports – more than the estimated total league revenue of both the National Basketball Association and the National Hockey League.” It does not seem rational that the NCAA, NCAA colleges, and some athletic program coaches make a significant amount of money, but the athletes see none of this money. Supporting this look, the following statistics according to Edelman, "Last year, the average salary for a BCS-eligible football coach was $2.05 million, also the average salary for a first-class men's basketball coach division of the NCAA exceeded $1 million, and in 40 of the 50 American states, the highest-paid public official is currently the coach of a state university's football or men's basketball team I work among all these groups and they are the ones who attract the fans, so it makes no sense that they don't receive any profits made from college athletics. College athletics is a billion-dollar industry.