Since 1992, the EPR has conducted 70 country reviews, the majority of which included reviews of Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries economic, even if a growing number of partner countries participate. The current review cycle examines key environmental trends within a given country, the national policy framework, environmental governance systems, the recognition of environmental policies in economic strategy, including through taxation or pricing mechanisms. Furthermore, the country being reviewed will be asked to choose two topics of particular importance and local relevance to undergo a full review. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on the topic "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get an original essay Data collection is carried out by the EPR Secretariat and uses external and OECD data sources, including environmental statistics provided by the OECD Working Group on Environmental Information (WPEI) ). After data collection, a review team visits the surveyed country and engages in meetings with various state and non-state actors. As a general rule, high-level government officials would lead delegations from surveyed countries. In addition to providing country-specific recommendations, peer review discussions highlight lessons learned from other participating countries that could lead to broader policy adoptions. Final reports are launched publicly at high-profile events and their findings are widely disseminated among policy makers, civil society organizations and the general public. OECD member states and selected partner countries are all subject to the review. Furthermore, UNECE has requested the OECD's help in designing an environmental review mechanism for UNECE member countries that are not part of the OECD. Each country is reviewed once every 7-8 years and the third round of reviews is currently underway. Progress reports are prepared on a voluntary basis by the countries examined. Each country subject to a subsequent review is also assessed in terms of its implementation of the recommendations of the previous review. This monitoring and evaluation process at the regional level has inspired some domestic policy reforms, such as the green tax reforms in Denmark and France. , as well as the creation of an Environmental Agency in New Zealand and the Ministry of the Environment in Chile. This review mechanism can also promote cross-sectoral collaboration and motivate policy alignment, especially in countries with a nascent environmental administration. Such peer reviews can empower the parties being reviewed by informing them, learning and developing policies, and increasing the legitimacy of policies. In fact, the OECD says that “recommendations resulting from such a review can also help governments gain support at the national level for difficult measures.” The OECD's experience and reputation as a pioneer of peer review helps to gain political and public attention and acceptance.