This advantage of the artistic movement helps to clarify historical evolution and dynamic identities. However, in linking his analysis exclusively to nations, which are surely the most powerful and attractive cluster identities, Anderson misses Isaacs' vital observation about the increasing fragmentation of the planetary system and its division into units on the opposite side or beyond below the state. However, Anderson's contribution is very important because it addresses the position of the "image" in creating a national reality. however, the question of state process remains unresolved, as all human associations and social groups are “imagined communities” and should be further delineated by constrained characteristics. A community depends on its members maintaining an accurate image of it that supports their perceptions and feelings. This leads the United States to question whether or not there are communities that don't seem fictitious. Or whether or not fictional communities, in their creation, are less real than different groups? If images of countries created under radically different circumstances and based on various variables share common options, they should not theirs