Due to the cultural and philosophical implications embedded in the painting, it appears that few individuals have full access to Chang's inspirations when he painted Lotus. Unfortunately I'm not one of them. Knowing only the basics of traditional Chinese philosophy and having too little life experience, I could appreciate the grace of the brushstrokes, but I found it a little difficult to connect my life to the intrinsic charm and wisdom of the artwork. Also, it seems to me that the Lotus is not as unique as the Water Lilies. The flower is such a popular theme in Chinese literature and arts that it has acquired a character of tenderness, elegance and nobility that is highly prized in Chinese culture. Chang portrayed those qualities perfectly in many ways, but I would like his work more if it contained more personal feelings. Indeed, despite having some similar qualities, Water Lilies and Lotus had approached the common theme of Water Lilies in divergent ways. I believe this is due to the different cultural backgrounds and personalities of Monet and Chang who used different materials and techniques to express their philosophical inspirations on flowers. I greatly admire both of their masterpieces and think they are both very beautiful in their own right