Hamlet Interpreted It is clear that Hamlet can be interpreted from a multitude of perspectives on numerous levels. I cannot understand Bloom's claim that it is a work of quasi-biblical importance, nor can I accept his allusions to Jesus or the Buddha. "Hamlet remains aloof; something transcendent about him places him more appropriately with the biblical King David, or with even more exalted scriptural figures." (Bloom, 384). My immediate response is that when Mr Bloom steps off this mortal coil, I don't think Billy Shakespeare will be waiting for him with a pint of beer. Professor Schechner's entertaining production increased my appreciation for the value of wardrobe and voice inflection. Before this performance I did not see Polonius as a buffoon (as played by Mr. Shapli), nor the incestuous nature of Ophelia's family relationships (Mrs. Cole's ability to transform from coquette to madman was shocking). No doubt there are as many interpretations of Hamlet as there are Shakespeare enthusiasts. My expertise lies in the political arena. I believe Hamlet can be interpreted as a treatise on aggressive and imperialistic behavior. Throughout the dramaturgical analysis of Hamlet Prince of Denmark, Hamlet's indecision is noted. He does not immediately seek revenge but continually plots, rants, and raves (in both his rational and mad moments). It is not clear whether cowardice, caution or simply indifference dominate his person; what is clear is his disgust at his own behavior: "How am I then, having a murdered father, a stained mother,... And I let everyone sleep, while to my shame I see the imminent death of twenty thousand men.. . (sic)." (Shakespeare, 116). The impending doom of the twenty thousand men hints at a campaign undertaken by Fortinbas, the prince of Norway. Although the battlefield is said to be of little value, Fortinbas is at war for the principles of honor and the subsequent expansion of Norway. An enraged Hamlet accidentally kills Polonius. Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are only sent to their meaningless deaths when inspired by the pirates to save their lives. These murders did not involve elaborate schemes but were simply carried out. Yet, with all his planning, his opportunities, his justification, why can't he kill Claudius? The portrayal of pirates as "merciful thieves" (Shakespeare, 124) and the fact that the belligerent Fortinbras succeeds in Poland and obtains the Kingdom of Denmark end of the play - could be a commentary on decisive and imperialistic behavior.