The way John and Jessica present Stop and Frisk will educate the public about what Stop and Frisk is and how the police are perpetuating a negative stereotype of minorities . I think this video shows Stop and Frisk in a different context by targeting wealthy white Americans and can educate the court on the impact of Stop and Frisk on the communities affected by this police procedural. The use of Stop and Frisk is impacting how citizens view police officers. This police procedural is impacting the trust citizens should have in law enforcement as they target minorities and abuse their authority. Stop and Frisk is also distracting communities from the authority of the Supreme Court because, by claiming that Stop and Frisk is constitutional, they are losing the trust of the American public. This Frisky Business video shows the deeper meaning that Stop and Frisk is impacting every community in America in a negative way. This is true because law enforcement is abusing their power by using Stop and Frisk to target minorities and doing so legally. I think this video is a good way to raise awareness about the Stop and Frisk issue and will spark a debate about whether or not the Supreme Court should revisit the issue. Many videos emerged that showed law enforcement officers abusing their power and stopping innocent people due to “reasonable suspicion.” The question many people have raised is what exactly reasonable suspicion is and how law enforcement differentiates reasonable from unreasonable
tags